Filmmaker Robert Altman was born on this day in 1925. He died in 2006, but not before first receiving an Honorary Oscar for lifetime achievement. Lily Tomlin and Meryl Streep offer a rather lengthy introduction (which I'll explain in a bit), and then the great director himself:
Robert Altman's revelation that he once had a heart transplant took just about anyone who recognized the name Robert Altman completely by surprise. Finding out you need a heart transplant, preparing beforehand for a heart transplant, recuperating from a heart transplant--doesn't all that take a while? No one could remember Altman being absent for any length of time. Now, he was a movie director and not a movie star, and so unlike the latter, Altman wasn't followed around by paparazzi the moment he walked off his property. Yet neither was he totally ignored by the portion of the media that covers the entertainment industry. For one thing he was a very prolific director, averaging a film a year since 1968. Some years there were two films. And there were projects for television (in the 1950s and '60s he been a prolific TV director) such as a new version of The Caine Mutiny Court-Martial (with Brad Davis in the Humphrey Bogart role) and his election year collaboration with Doonesbury cartoonist Garry Trudeau, Tanner 88, starring a favorite actor of his, Michael Murphy. Altman also had an air of motion picture historicity about him, ever since his 1970 landmark film MASH introduced, or at least emphasized as no film had before, a whole grab bag of cinematic tricks that made the "New Hollywood" landmark of a few years earlier, The Graduate, look like The Great Train Robbery. By the 1990s, moviegoers had moved on to other things, and the box office misses exceeded the box office hits. Yet no matter how commercially (though not necessarily artistically) irrelevant he became, there always was enough of a buzz about a new Robert Altman film to guarantee him a fresh round of interviews with the leading entertainment journalists. So how in the world could a heart transplant be so overlooked?
Turns out one prominent entertainment journalist WAS paying attention. On December 3, 1995, Army Archerd in his long-running Variety column reported “Good wishes are out to director Robert Altman who underwent heart transplant surgery Sunday. Altman had known the surgery was necessary since last March, friends say.” Altman's wife Kathryn promptly got in touch with USA Today, and that venerable newsmagazine a few days later supposedly set the record straight: “If you heard Robert Altman had a heart transplant, we happily report it’s untrue. He has heart problems, he’s fine. He’ll be fishing next week.” We now know that Mrs. Altman was less than honest with the venerable newsmagazine, as she admitted later on, "We denied it like hell." Why? According to Altman himself "There was such a stigma associated with a heart transplant at that time" He was afraid no one would ever let him direct another film, thinking he might drop dead on the set. Well, it's understandable. Who among us hasn't fudged the truth on a job application or résumé? There's still the question of the prolific filmmaker's busy schedule. I looked up Altman's filmography, and there is in fact quite a gap between Prêt-à-Porter, which came out in December of 1994, and Kansas City, which was released in August of 1996. Had Altman been a movie star such a long absence from the public eye wouldn't have gone unnoticed, but he was a movie director, so it did. Altman lived another 11 years after his transplant, about four years short of average. However, it was not heart disease but another insidious malady that felled him: leukemia.
We now move from the heart to another internal organ, the larynx, informally referred to as the voice box. If you're not familiar with Robert Altman's work, you may have been puzzled by Lily Tomlin's and Meryl Streep's introduction. Why were they stepping on each other's sentences? Was there static on the teleprompter? Lily and Meryl were in fact trying to evoke one of the defining features of an Altman film: overlapping dialogue. Now, Altman didn't come up with the idea. Howard Hawks used it in His Girl Friday (1940), and Orson Welles (along with every other cinematic trick) in Citizen Kane (1941). Altman, working thirty years after Hawks and Welles, had a technological advantage they lacked: multitrack recording, basically wiring each actor with a mike, taping each actor's dialogue with separate tape recorders, and later playing it all back in a sound studio, turning up the volume on the bit of dialogue most meaningful to the film. At least, I think that's how he did it. After all, I'm not a sound engineer (comment section mainstay Shady Seaweed worked in television--maybe he can elaborate.) However it was done, Altman's reasons for doing so differed from Hawks and Welles, who simply wanted to cram as much exposition as they could in a scene. Exposition never concerned Altman much. It's impossible in practice but were a 30-something Ernest Hemingway to write a one-page synopsis of MASH or McCabe & Mrs. Miller or Nashville or A Wedding and turn it in to a community college teaching assistant for grading, he would get an F for having too many meandering sentences and not coming to the point. Even if some of his movies like The Long Goodbye, The Player, or Gosford Park had something resembling a plot, it was not narrative that Altman was after but a more immersive experience for the viewer. And a voyeuristic one as well. Not in the sense of looking through a peephole, but the voyeurism that we can't but participate in when we're amongst a crowd of people, and overhear little snatches of conversation, even inconsequential snatches of conversation that would otherwise bore us if we were being addressed to directly, but paradoxically intrigue us when absorbed secondhand. However, if you just as soon be by yourself and don't want anyone else around you, avoid this potentially absorbing collection of Robert Altman's signature conversation set pieces:
Shhhhh! I'm trying to listen.
Hello Kirk, I have looked up Altman's filmography, and I do not believe I have seen any of his films. Somehow, they don't seem like my type of movies. However, which one would you recommend if I wanted to try one? Apparently his transplant was a success, for he lived a long life. --Jim
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteJim, you'd have to tell me why you think they wouldn't be your type of movies. My favorites are MASH and Nashville, but both films are very unconventional (nevertheless, they were both hits.) Countdown is Altman's most conventional movie. It could have been directed by anyone (well, anyone who's a talented director, as it's a very watchable film.) If you just want a little taste of the Altman style (peripatetic camerawork, hazy cinematography, crowded set pieces, the aforementioned overlapping dialogue) but don't want to be overwhelmed by it, I suggest The Player or the TV (as opposed to the 1950s movie) version of The Caine Mutiny. Many of Altman's films can seem like documentaries or realty shows, so if you don't like 60 Minutes or Big Brother, I'd stay away. Also, though Altman most often (and somewhat amazingly) made his movies within the Hollywood system, they resemble the type of flick you'd see at a Sundance-like film festival, or a foreign film, so if that turns you off, stay away.
DeleteOverlapping dialogue, thank goodness for rewinds now on streaming or on DVDs...
ReplyDeleteJM, with an Altman movie, you might be rewinding all night.
DeleteI looked him up also. 35 films. I've seen one. Mash. But I think I've seen it 35 times.
ReplyDeleteMike, time for a 36th.
DeleteI'm not a fan of overlapping dialogue. Not in life and not in movies.
ReplyDeleteYour best bet is prose, Debra. You usually don't find it there.
DeleteHi, Kirk! Happy 97th birthday in heaven to director Robert Altman! It's a shame he didn't get 40 more years of life from his transplanted heart as he anticipated in that Academy Honorary Award acceptance speech. Unless I am mistaken, he died that very same year. Like many members of the audience, I started fidgeting midway through the rambling introduction delivered by Lily and Meryl. I'm sure most people in attendance understood what they were doing and where they were going with it, but it could have been and should have been shorter. That said, I realize Meryl was going through a rough patch at the time. We need to remember that the dingo took her baby. I thoroughly enjoyed the clip at the end of the post giving examples of overlapping dialogue used in Altman films. I have seen many of them, and very much appreciate the technique, especially knowing that much of the dialogue is improvised, the mark of an actor's director. Overlapping dialogue is natural. It imitates real life. I absolutely hate dumbed-down TV series like Criminal Minds that routinely have scenes where all of the members of the squad sit in a room and brainstorm about the case. Each character takes his or her turn delivering a neat little line of dialogue uninterrupted by the others. We go around the room and hear from each character. Each one is given the same amount of air time and equally important input. It is totally unrealistic, boring and insulting. Such scenes resemble a kindergarten play. Overlapping dialogue was notably used in one of my favorite films, one of the first I saw as a child - The Thing From Another World (1951). That aspect alone makes it a cut above other sci-fi films of the 50s. I can't add anything useful to what you have already written about the layering of dialogue. I can tell you that it is an art. The timing, relative sound levels and treble presence need to be tweaked perfect to make the dialogue pop and avoid a chaotic mess. It is absolutely remarkable that Altman regarded his heart transplant as a mere speed bump and kept working during that period. Thank you very much for this interesting essay on Altman's life and work. Have a great week, good buddy Kirk!
DeleteShady, I will not stand for unfounded accusations in this comment section! That dingo is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law! (Though I think the undomesticated pooch may have been tried in absentia.) Shady, I don't know if you ever watched Star Trek: The Next Generation, but for the show's first couple of seasons, Captain Picard used to sit everyone around at the table and calmly ask each crew member what they thought the best course of action should be, even as some alien entity was munching on the starship Enterprise. It drove me crazy. This was at the command of Trek head honcho Gene Roddenberry, who wanted to show how cooperative folks would be in the future. He felt no need to show such cooperation in the original Star Trek, in which nearly every episode was highlighted by a dispute between Spock ("Doctor, you fail to comprehend") and McCoy ("You pointy-eared hobgoblin!") There was no overlapping dialogue, but it was entertaining, nonetheless. After Roddenberry died in 1991, the producers of Next Generation wisely cut back on those round-the-table discussions. What good is a utopian future if it's going to bore you to death? The Thing from Another World was produced by Howard Hawks. Many think he directed it too, though a man named Christian Nyby was credited. Here's what Nyby had to say about it in 1982: "Did Hawks direct it? That's one of the most inane and ridiculous questions I've ever heard, and people keep asking. That it was Hawks' style. Of course it was. This is a man I studied and wanted to be like. You would certainly emulate and copy the master you're sitting under, which I did. Anyway, if you're taking painting lessons from Rembrandt, you don't take the brush out of the master's hands" I've read that paragraph five times and am still not sure if Nyby is admitting Hawks directed it or denying it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKv5MshdCe8
DeleteI enjoyed watching that clip. The newsman, "Scotty," tramps on other characters' lines throughout the film, and so does leading man Ken Tobey's character, Captain Hendry. It's very realistic, conveying the panic that is setting in as they deal with the "carrot man" from outer space played by James Arness of Gunsmoke fame.
DeleteRather interesting about overlapping voices. I didn't know about that. Why when I read the names Dennis Altman and Brad Davis I thought of gay connection between the two?
ReplyDeleteAndrew, I had to look up the name Dennis Altman. I see that he's a gay rights activist in Australia, where you reside. As far as I know, he's no relation to Robert Altman, the father of six. As for Brad Davis, he played a gay (or bisexual) sailor in Querelle, directed by Rainer Werner Fassbinder and based on a novel by Jean Genet. Onstage, Davis was the first actor to play Ned Weeks, a character based on Larry Kramer, in The Normal Heart, written by the aforementioned Kramer. In real life Davis had a wife and fathered a son. However, he was diagnosed as HIV positive in 1985, which he kept secret from the public until shortly before his death in 1991. According to his widow, it was assisted suicide. Whether Davis and Dennis Altman ever crossed paths, I can't tell you, but the latter is still alive.
Delete