5. Warp Driving on Empty
In the last installment I
mentioned "Assignment: Earth", a pilot film for a new Gene Roddenberry series in the guise
of a typical
Star Trek episode, though there was nothing typical about it. In early 1968
Trek faced
imminent cancellation, and Roddenberry had high hopes that this new show could be its replacement. The network dashed those hopes, but it turned out a replacement wasn't necessary after all. At least not just then. With the help of a fan of the show named Bjo (Betty Jo)
Trimble, Roddenberry organized a letter-writing campaign, and this being the
1960s, even a demonstration, with a thousand students from twenty
different colleges marching on NBC's Burbank studios. The network
relented, and
Star Trek was renewed for a third season.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee21b/ee21b998f07aa46a85ee9d1f81f4a5702bafa282" alt=""
What happened next might seem surprising. Roddenberry basically quit
Star Trek. Why? He had hoped for a better time slot. During the second season, the show had aired on 8:30 Friday nights, following
Tarzan
starring Ron Ely. The ape man series got middling ratings, and
Roddenberry blamed the lead-in for his own series middling ratings. It also
reportedly galled him to be following
Tarzan period, whatever
the ratings. An Edgar Rice Burroughs fan since childhood, Roddenberry
was working on his own Tarzan screenplay, which he knew would never get
produced as long as there was a TV version on the air. So when
Tarzan was
canceled, and
Star Trek wasn't, it seemed like two good things were happening at once.
Except that for its third season, NBC scheduled
Star Trek in a later time slot: Friday nights at 10:00, when so many of those college kids who had converged on
Burbank were out partying.
Trek now followed
The Name of the Game, a series
about the going-ons of a magazine publishing company. Whatever audience
existed for that show (it lasted three years) most likely wasn't all
that into science fiction. So Roddenberry walked away from the series he
created without actually walking away. He was still Executive Producer, still drew a paycheck,
could still use the show to hawk things like the IDIC pendant, but, by
most accounts, in that third season, he saw each episode for the first
time when anyone else interested saw each episode for the first time, on 10:00 Friday nights. As
for Tarzan, there's been several movies since Ely last swung on the vine
in 1968, but none based on a Gene Roddenberry screenplay.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/318b9/318b9e834fa483fc791459d61130fa13216a9da9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/163f4/163f478544f23365680d5e27444be3ebf7b33cce" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/acab4/acab46f3e5f91eb93ddf4a0d43466bc760cc8ca4" alt=""
With
Gene L. Coon gone, Gene Roddenberry practically gone, Associate
Producer Robert Justman (who reportedly acted as Roddenberry's eyes and
ears when he wasn't around) on his way out, and D.C. Fontana deciding
she no longer wanted to be Story Editor (though she continued to
contribute scripts, sometimes under fake names if there were too many changes made by others), Paramount Studios decided to bring in an outsider to run the show, a
fellow by the name of Fred Freiberger. His most notable science fiction credits up to that point were two
movies he was credited with writing during the 1950s monster craze,
The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms (1953), about a dinosaur come to life in modern times, and
The Beginning of the End (1957), which featured giant grasshoppers. I've seen both films, and they're both mindless fun. Whereas
Star Trek, at
its very best, was fun that also engaged the mind. By the early '60s,
Freiberger had moved into television, where he wrote for shows as disparate as
Bonanza and
The Beverly Hillbillies. TV writing led to TV producing, including a few episodes of the medical drama
Ben Casey. The first season of
The Wild, Wild, West
(a show Coon also worked on) was his most recent producing credit when
he was called to helm the third, and what many now consider to be the
worst, season of
Star Trek. Both William Shatner and Nichelle
Nichols has defended Freiberger on that charge, claiming he did the best
he could under trying circumstances, such as an even greater reduced
budget and large staff turnover. They may be right, but looking over the
characterless nature of that third season, Freiberger doesn't seem to
have had any personal vision that he brought to the series, as had the two
Genes. It was just another show to produce and get out on time. That
kind of attitude may have worked for the dozens of lookalike western,
detective, and secret agent series on at the time, but with a science fiction
show where anything can happen, minus a personal vision what you end up
with, unfortunately, is a science fiction show where anything can happen,
including something as goofy (and not all that vital to the storyline) as
the starship Enterprise shrunk down to the size of a toaster. Science
fiction's very weirdness is what attracts some of us to the genre, but
there's smart weird and there's silly weird, and
Star Trek began
slipping into the latter category. It didn't but might as well have had
giant grasshoppers. What's the difference between those and a miniature
starship, other than a few hundred feet?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9207/d9207cf45c42b4525458a012fc5de7cef8c9dade" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c8e8/2c8e8d9d0fbc4b752ccc90b3491dff1f0747a7f5" alt=""
The
season wasn't a total loss. Among the high points (in my opinion) are
the episodes "Spectre of the Gun", "Day of the Dove", "The Tholian Web",
"Let That Be Your Last Battlefield", "That Which Survives" and "The
Cloud Minders". Unfortunately those weren't enough to offset the many
low points. In addition to a general silliness, there was a cruel edge
to the series that third season.
Star Trek had always had a dark side
(especially for those crew members wearing red shirts), but nothing
before made me squirm more than watching the telepathic sadists in
"Plato's Stepchildren" force Spock to cry like a baby. And in the otherwise worthwhile "The
Empath" Dr. McCoy is actually
tortured (no doubt confirming his
most xenophobic fears about aliens--and these aliens were self-righteous
hypocrites to boot.) An amnesiac Kirk falls in love with an American (by
way of outer space) Indian princess, only to watch her get stoned to death in "The Paradise
Syndrome". I wouldn't call it cruel exactly, but Kirk has to go under
the knife to make himself look like a Romulan for some routine espionage
in "The Enterprise Incident". Alexander Scott (
I Spy) or Barney Collier (
Mission: Impossible) never
had to do that. The
Children of the Damned ripoff "And the
Children Shall Lead" is probably worth watching just to see one-time
famous attorney Marvin Belli ham it up as an alien apparition. Instead
of ambulances he chases starships. In "The Savage Curtain" Abraham Lincoln is no match for Genghis Khan. So where's General Grant when you need him? The episode "Is There No Truth in
Beauty" contradicts itself completely. Supposedly the moral is we
shouldn't judge someone solely on their physical appearance, but has
Spock, the character least likely to do that, go insane after eying a
homely alien. Of course, we never get to see this alien for ourselves.
It wouldn't do to have the television audience go insane and further
erode the ratings. The show did take a few stabs at political and social
issues in that third season. Racial conflict (black-and-white vs
white-and-black) in "Let This Be Your Last Battlefield". That was
successful enough, I feel, though some have found it heavy-handed. Less
successful and not so much heavy-handed as thickheaded is "The Mark of
Gideon" which deals with overpopulation. The only thing the episode can
say about the subject is that kidnapping starship captains for their
germs is no way to solve the problem (though I suppose it's a better solution than Soylent
Green.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6c39/b6c398e0cbd29efea896a5c867f194a840f3c6d8" alt=""
Finally, "Requiem for
Methuselah" (the one with the incredible shrinking Enterprise) has a
provocative enough premise: an immortal man, while possessing no more
intelligence or talent than anyone else, through a centuries-long
accumulation of experience and knowledge, becomes some of the greatest
figures in history (and/or legend), including Methuselah, Solomon,
Alexander the Great, Merlin, Da Vinci, and Brahms. But once that
provocative idea is introduced, the story has no idea what to do with
it, other then have the immortal man and Kirk engage in a routine brawl over a girl.
Hardly a great way to cap a three thousand year career.
Before I tell you what happened next to what has come to be known as the
Star Trek franchise--and a LOT happened next--I want to take a break from our narrative in order to take a closer look at that Vulcan pal of ours.
Next: Spock Reconsidered
Spock......go insane? Even momentarily? Missed that episode - and a lot of other ones.
ReplyDeleteLooking forward to Spock Reconsidered.
Rest assured, Spock regains his senses by the end of the episode, Kass
ReplyDelete