I'll write about the bounced commies and Luke Short's new western some other time. For now I want you to focus solely on Norman Rockwell's illustration. The people pictured seem realistically rendered, don't they? That's partly due to Rockwell's skill as a painter, especially his almost photographic attention to detail, and partly because, well, they're real people. The woman doing the hugging is Rockwell's second wife Mary. The young man she's embracing and who's back is turned to us is Jarvis Rockwell, her and Norman's oldest son. On the far-left edge of the painting, in glasses, is youngest son Peter. And the exuberant lad in the plaid shirt right behind Mary is middle son Thomas. The man with the pipe who seems to be looking on at the scene taking place with amused curiosity is none other than the family patriarch, Norman himself. The family that models together stays together.
Yet according to Deborah Solomon's 2013 biography, American Mirror: The Life and Art of Norman Rockwell, this was anything but a model family. Rockwell was insecure about just about everything but his chosen profession. And even then, he was more secure doing commercial art--which a Saturday Evening Post cover basically is--than the type of art found in galleries and museums, which in his case turned out to be the same thing but the latter not realized until very late in his life. This insecurity led to him maintaining a certain aloof distance from family and friends, and family at least paid a price for this aloofness, most notably wife Mary, who developed a serious drinking problem that repeatedly landed her in and out of the hospital. Eventually the whole family ended up in therapy. The illustration itself doesn't truly reflect on the Rockwell family's 1948 Christmas. Norman spent the holiday in Los Angeles--as a kind of personal getaway, while the rest of the family stayed behind in Vermont.
Does that make the above illustration a lie? Not necessarily. It could have taken place during a different Christmas. Or just as likely, Rockwell may have witnessed somebody else's family reunion, and just replaced that other person's family members with his own, achieving in art what his own insecurities prohibited him from doing in life. Whatever the reason or whatever happened, it's worth remembering that imperfect people and imperfect families, both of which there are a great deal many, have to find ways to make it through a holiday season in which the perfected art of happiness is practically a moral mandate. Enjoy the eggnog and brush strokes.
Enough of that. I don't want to ruin your holiday. So I'll turn my attention to the woman pictured above, who is also in the Rockwell illustration. Turns out she was an...
Christmas at Home (1946) |
...artist herself.
That's right, it's Grandma Moses. Born in 1860, the farmer's widow didn't take up painting until age seventy-six. Completely self-taught (thus a "primitive" artist) she produced pictures of what she termed "old-timey" New England. One of these pictures ended up hung in a rural drug store, where a big city art collector out for a drive in the country saw it. Soon after a collection of her works hung in the gallery of an Austrian refugee who had run afoul of the Nazis for the twin crimes of being Jewish and advocating modern art. That was waaay different from anything that happened to Grandma Moses in old-timey New Hampshire, but no matter, soon she went from folk art to what might be called fine art, though the style remained basically the same, only now exhibited in different venues. As she became more well-known, Grandma Moses became a pop culture figure as well, thanks in large part to Hallmark cards, which reproduced her paintings on a series of popular greeting cards.
Norman Rockwell, himself a pop culture figure with a line of Hallmark greeting cards, helps Grandma Moses cut a cake celebrating her 88th birthday. The whole thing was a PR stunt dreamed up by a Hallmark exec. It certainly made sense to pair the two, who had just met. Though their artistic styles, and perhaps their artistic sensibilities, differed, what both of them offered the greeting card consumer was that much sought-after commodity: warmth. And wouldn't you know it that a genuine warmth did develop between the two? They became friends. Not best friends. The age difference (he was thirty-four years her junior) and Rockwell's own aforementioned aloofness, got in the way of that, but for a while Grandma Moses was part of his social circle, and as with anyone part of his social (and familial) circle, it eventually got her on The Saturday Evening Post. Not that Grandma Moses needed his help getting on the...
...cover of a magazine.
Take it away, Judy:
A wonderful post!
ReplyDeleteThank you, Mitchell. Merry Christmas.
DeleteI'm familiar with both Rockwell's and Grandma Moses' art, but now you've got me wanting to learn more about the artists themselves! I really hope Grandma Moses was secretly a Wild Child to offset that staid bun and lacy collar.
ReplyDeleteHave a warm and nostalgic Christmas, Kirk (If that's your thing).
Debra, as I recall the hippies of my (elementary school) youth, quite a few young women did wear buns and lacy collars. Merry Christmas, Debra.
DeleteI fascinating photo of two legendary artist! How cool. To date...I don't know of any artist without some sort of issue. Par for the course it seems.
ReplyDeleteA Happy Yuletide Kirk!🎄🎄🎄🎄
Whatever the issue, still they create art. A happy Yuletide to you, too, Maddie.
DeleteHi Kirk, Everyone on the Rockwell cover is smiling so goofily it seems that they are already on lithium or whatever the equivalent was then. Sadly, many happy-appearing artists, writers, and so forth are actually the opposite. Perhaps this is the inevitable result of high expectations. Rockwell's (for example) paintings are so full of good humor and wholesomeness that it was basically impossible for him to live up to his own standard.
ReplyDelete.
About the St. Louis movie, I don't know why people even think that song was intended to be charming. The whole movie is about the psychological torture of the little girl by the successive breaking up of her hitherto stable family. This sad song, about more breakups and loneliness, is what finally drives her over the edge, although I have to say that Margaret O'Brien really earned her acting fee in that scene where she goes berserk. The song gives me the creeps, not warm holiday feelings. Perhaps that is your intention by including it here today.
.
Anyway, I hope that you personally have a nice holiday, more like the magazine cover of your choice.
--Jim
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteJim, while I can't say the song gives me the creeps, I agree--or I at least I think I'm in agreement with you--that the original 1944 lyrics (there are others which I'll get to in a moment) are not meant to be an idealization of Christmas but instead how our idealization of Christmas may fall short of the reality. Idealization vs reality is a favorite theme of mine, and a major theme of this blog (though I do try to coat the reality part with a spoon full of pop culture sugar) so it appeals to me for that reason. Let me examine the last two lines of that song:
Delete"Until then, we'll have to muddle through somehow/So have yourself a merry little Christmas now"
I interpret that to mean even if it doesn't live up to the ideal, don't let it get in the way of whatever merriment may be there for the taking. Keep in mind that although Meet Me in St Louis takes place in 1903, it was made in 1944, when World War II was preventing a lot of Christmases from living up to the ideal. Around the same time Bing Crosby sang a song that ended THIS way:
"I'll be home for Christmas/If only in my dreams"
Enough creepiness to go around back in them days.
Returning to "Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas", note I said "original lyrics". In 1957, Frank Sinatra decided to do a cover of the song, but feeling the last two lines were too melancholic, had lyricist Hugh Martin make this change:
"Hang a shining star upon the highest bough/And have yourself a merry little Christmas now"
Dozens of artists have covered the song since them, and most of them favor the Sinatra lyrics over the Garland lyrics (including Garland herself in a 1964 TV Christmas special.) For what it's worth, the ideal won out. Musically, anyway.
In the meantime, Jim, I hope you have a merry little Christmas. Just make sure you don't pull a muscle hanging a shiny star on the highest bough.
I never thought about Grandma Moses being a real person!
ReplyDeleteMike, you may have confused her with Granny Moses, a character on The Beverly Hillbillies.
DeleteOh, and merry Christmas, Mike.
DeleteHi Kirk, No matter how many times I accept Blogger's cookies, they snub me and pretend they don't know me. Wordpress is just as bad. Maybe they are putting out all the cookies for Santa.
ReplyDelete--Jim
That's all right, Jim. I figured out it was you.
DeleteMerry Christmas Kirk. Hope you are having a good one :-D
ReplyDeleteAnd a Merry Christmas to you, Ananka.
Delete